Download Argumentation and Education: Theoretical Foundations and by Nathalie Muller Mirza, Anne-Nelly Perret-Clermont PDF

By Nathalie Muller Mirza, Anne-Nelly Perret-Clermont

During the decade, argumentation has attracted transforming into recognition as a way to elicit strategies (linguistic, logical, dialogical, mental, etc.) which could maintain or impress reasoning and studying. Constituting a tremendous measurement of lifestyle and actions, argumentation performs a distinct position in democracies and is on the middle of philosophical reasoning and clinical inquiry. Argumentation, as such, calls for particular highbrow and social abilities. for that reason, argumentation may have an expanding significance in schooling, either since it is a vital competence that needs to be discovered, and since argumentation can be utilized to foster studying in philosophy, background, sciences and in lots of different domains.

However, studying argumentation and studying via arguing, in class, nonetheless increase theoretical and methodological questions reminiscent of: How do studying strategies increase in argumentation? the right way to layout potent argumentative actions? How can the argumentative efforts of students could be sustained? What are the mental matters concerned whilst arguing with others? how one can assessment and study the inexperienced persons’ productions?

Argumentation and Education solutions those and different questions by means of supplying either theoretical backgrounds, in psychology, schooling and concept of argumentation, and urban examples of experiments and ends up in tuition contexts in a number of domain names. It reviews on current cutting edge practices in schooling settings at quite a few degrees.

Show description

Read or Download Argumentation and Education: Theoretical Foundations and Practices PDF

Similar educational psychology books

Learning Spaces (Society for Research Into Higher Education)

“This is a well timed and critical ebook which seeks to reclaim universities as areas of studying. it really is jargon loose and forcefully argued. it's going to be on each primary and vice-chancellor's record of crucial studying. ” Jon Nixon, Professor of academic experiences, collage of Sheffield the facility to have or to discover house in educational existence appears more and more tough considering that we appear to be ate up through educating and bidding, crushed by way of emails and underwhelmed by way of lengthy onerous conferences.

Brief Intervention for School Problems, Second Edition: Outcome-Informed Strategies (The Guilford School Practitioner Series)

Each interplay with a teen who's suffering is a chance for swap. This hugely sensible consultant is helping college practitioners locate powerful ideas to educational and behavioral difficulties via short counseling. It exhibits the best way to construct at the rules and assets that scholars, mom and dad, and academics carry to the intervention technique, inside of an leading edge, research-supported, time-limited framework.

Transformative Talk: Cognitive Coaches Share Their Stories

Transformative speak assists an aspirant trainer in development their own functions. It attracts upon all the insights and stories of Cognitive training education affiliates and employer running shoes who're making it paintings. every one bankruptcy at various levels displays own trips shared with the categorical purpose to help you, the reader, in making connections on your personal paintings and your development as a trainer.

Visual Art and Education in an Era of Designer Capitalism: Deconstructing the Oral Eye

This ebook deals a different viewpoint of artwork and its schooling in fashion designer capitalism. it is going to give a contribution to the talk as to percentages artwork and layout carry for the longer term. It additionally questions the vast technologization of artwork that's happening.

Additional resources for Argumentation and Education: Theoretical Foundations and Practices

Sample text

7); moreover, the validity of argumentation depends on its acceptance by the audience. This view can indeed be regarded as a relativistic stance, because the adaptation to the audience turns out to be, in Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca’s view, the ultimate criterion for evaluating argumentation (see the discussion of this point in van Eemeren and Grootendorst 1994, p. 17),26 even though the audience to which the arguments are addressed can be not only particular, but also universal. The notion of universal audience remains however vague, and it is rather obscure why and how it could offer a more objective criterion of validity.

Finally, the inferential structure of a locus is analyzed by focusing on the maxims arising from different knots of this ontology and on the endoxa they evoke. The latter part outlines the argument generator, which includes a taxonomy of loci and the presentation of one or more maxims arising from each locus, with their application to specific arguments, by mapping maxims onto the information protocol offered by the context (see Fig. 6). As mentioned, the model has been more systematically illustrated in other occasions (see, in particular, Rigotti and Greco 2006; Rigotti 2006, 2009a).

38 This rule can be interpreted as an explicit mention of the principle according to which the reasonable attitude requested by argumentation presupposes rationality. 39 Rule 10 directly recalls the maxim of clarity proposed by Grice (1975) as a general component of the principle of cooperation in conversation. 36 E. Rigotti and S. 40 This notion allows reconciling “a long-standing gap between the dialectical and the rhetorical approach to argumentation” (van Eemeren and Houtlosser 2005, p. 41 Concerning modern studies in argumentation, the contribution of Douglas Walton surely deserves to be brought up.

Download PDF sample

Rated 5.00 of 5 – based on 16 votes