By Joel D. S. Rasmussen
This e-book bargains a singular interpretation of the connection among non secular problem and creative creativity within the works of the self-styled "Christian poet and philosopher" Søren Kierkegaard (1813-1855). even supposing Kierkegaard articulated neither a "Christology" within the feel that the time period has for systematic theology, nor a widespread "theory of poetry" within the experience that word has for literary feedback, this research makes the case that Kierkegaard's writings however do enhance a "Christomorphic poetics," a tertium quid that resists traditional differences among theology and literature. Arguing that Kierkegaard's poetics takes form in dialog with some of the significant issues of early German Romanticism (irony, inventive creativity, paradox, the relativization of imitation [mimesis], and erotic love), this publication deals a clean appreciation of the intensity of Kierkegaard's engagement with Romanticism, and of the contours of his substitute to that literary movement.
Read Online or Download Between Irony and Witness: Kierkegaard's Poetics of Faith, Hope, and Love PDF
Best theology books
Jonathan Edwards's Philosophy of Nature: The Re-Enchantment of the realm within the Age of medical Reasoning analyses the works of Jonathan Edwards (1703-1758) on ordinary philosophy in a sequence of contexts in which they might top be explored and understood. Its objective is to put Edwards's writings on traditional philosophy within the large historic, theological and clinical context of a wide selection of non secular responses to the increase of contemporary technological know-how within the early sleek interval John Donne's response to the hot astronomical philosophy of Copernicus, Kepler and Galileo, in addition to to Francis Bacon's new typical philosophy; Blaise Pascal's reaction to Descartes' mechanical philosophy; the reactions to Newtonian technology and at last Jonathan Edwards's reaction to the clinical tradition and mind's eye of his time.
"If we harbor recommendations of violence or hatred, or search revenge or retribution, we're contributing to the wounding of the area; if we rework these ideas into forgiveness and compassion, after which stream past them to really make amends or restitution, we're contributing to the therapeutic of the area.
Will humans of different faiths be 'saved' and to what quantity should still the reaction to this query form Christian engagements with humans of different faiths? traditionally, the essential resolution to those questions has been that the individual of one other religion are usually not kept and is hence short of conversion to Christianity for his or her salvation to be attainable.
Gnostic the US is a studying of present American tradition, politics, and non secular existence in response to the traditional move often called Gnosticism. In it, Peter M Burfeind builds off the rules of Hans Jonas, Denis de Rougement, Norman Cohn, William Voegelin, Carl Jung, and Harold Bloom, every one of whom observed the consequences of Gnosticism in modern American (and Western) existence.
- God and Goodness: A Natural Theological Perspective
- The Philosophy of Language (Oxford Readings in Philosophy)
- Christian Apologetics as Cross-Cultural Dialogue
- God & The Modern World (Marquette Studies in Philosophy)
- Methods of Dogmatic Theology
- Shaping a Digital World: Faith, Culture and Computer Technology
Additional resources for Between Irony and Witness: Kierkegaard's Poetics of Faith, Hope, and Love
Kierkegaard, Either/Or, 2:173; SKS, 3:169. 140. Kierkegaard, Either/Or, 2:174-75; SKS, 3:170-71. 141. Kierkegaard, Either/Or, 2:175; SKS, 3:170. 142. Kierkegaard, Either/Or, 2:175; SKS, 3:171. 143. Kierkegaard, Either/Or, 2:176; SKS, 3:171. 144. Meller, Om Udodeligheden, 196; my translation. "145 Here it has become clear that what William, Moller, and Kierkegaard all see as similar between the dialectic of Romantic irony and the dialectic of speculative philosophy is that, in their views, neither dialectic helps an individual become an earnest self.
Kierkegaard, Either/Or, 2:139; SKS, 3:137. 125. Kierkegaard, Either/Or, 2:139; SKS, 3:137. 126. Kierkegaard, Either/Or, 2:137; SKS, 3:136. 127 "Rather than designating the choice between good and evil my Either/Or designates the choice by which one chooses good and evil or rules them out. "128 William has a number of ways of describing this choice wherein the question of good and evil does or does not become an issue for an individual, as Merold Westphal points out: Often he describes it as an absolute choice of the self in its eternal validity.
V. Miller (New York: Humanities Press, 1969), 431-43, esp. 433. 137. Kierkegaard, Either/Or, 1:38; SKS, 2:47. 138. Kierkegaard, Either/Or, 2:173; SKS, 3:169. 38 BETWEEN IRONY AND WITNESS between competing alternatives for how to live. The precise reason William thinks speculative philosophy is just as ethically impotent as Romantic irony has to do with its confusion of the sphere of freedom with that of thought. "For thought, the contradiction does not exist," he says; "it passes over into the other and thereupon together with the other into a higher unity.