Download Decision Making with Dominance Constraints in Two-Stage by Uwe Gotzes PDF

By Uwe Gotzes

Two-stage stochastic programming types are regarded as appealing instruments for making optimum judgements lower than uncertainty. characteristically, optimality is formalized through using statistical parameters resembling the expectancy or the conditional worth in danger to the distributions of aim values.

Uwe Gotzes analyzes an method of account for possibility aversion in two-stage versions established upon partial orders at the set of genuine random variables. those stochastic orders allow the incorporation of the features of complete distributions into the choice technique. The revenue or price distributions needs to go a benchmark try out with a given applicable distribution. hence, extra ambitions might be optimized. For this new type of stochastic optimization difficulties, effects on constitution and balance are confirmed and a adapted set of rules to take on huge challenge circumstances is constructed. the consequences of the modelling historical past and numerical effects from the applying of the proposed set of rules are confirmed with case stories from strength buying and selling.

Show description

Read Online or Download Decision Making with Dominance Constraints in Two-Stage Stochastic Integer Programming PDF

Similar software development books

Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software

4 top-notch authors current the 1st ebook containing a catalog of object-oriented layout styles. Readers will tips on how to use layout styles within the object-oriented improvement strategy, tips on how to clear up particular layout difficulties utilizing styles, and achieve a standard vocabulary for object-oriented layout.

Extreme Programming Perspectives

Offers forty seven articles that characterize the insights and sensible knowledge of the leaders of the XP group. provide experience-based suggestions for enforcing XP successfully and offers winning transitioning concepts. Softcover.

Decision Making with Dominance Constraints in Two-Stage Stochastic Integer Programming

Two-stage stochastic programming versions are regarded as beautiful instruments for making optimum judgements less than uncertainty. commonly, optimality is formalized by means of utilising statistical parameters corresponding to the expectancy or the conditional price in danger to the distributions of goal values. Uwe Gotzes analyzes an method of account for danger aversion in two-stage versions established upon partial orders at the set of genuine random variables.

Additional resources for Decision Making with Dominance Constraints in Two-Stage Stochastic Integer Programming

Sample text

The part supplied by the retailer is subdivided into the part the retailer acquired in the futures market and the part, which is managed using the pool. 10). 10). 9). 9) has a unique first-stage solution. Benchmark 1 and Benchmark 2: Now we will come to more meaningful choices of benchmark profiles. We define two profit benchmark distributions with 10 scenarios that might reflect economic targets of the retailing company, i. 2). 12(d) yield the information just described, accordingly for benchmark 1 and benchmark 2.

7. As can be seen from the figure on the right-hand side, the suggested benchmark distributions are not comparable with respect to ≤icx , since they intersect each other. 7 belongs to the integrated survival function with respect to Finf{a1 ,a2 } . 17). It belongs to the cumulative distribution function of the largest random variable Z less than or equal to X and Y in the increasing convex order. 6: Distribution functions proposed by two decision makers. The gray line depicts the distribution function that satisfies both of them.

2) The function D( . ) is piecewise linear and concave. 1). A simple but very slowly converging alternative would be the iterative method ([5, 91, 92]) λn+1 := λn − sn · λn∗ with λn∗ ∈ = ∂ (−D(λn )) (∂ denotes the subdifferential) K L −∑π · conv (x∗ ,Δ∗ )∈arg min{D(λn )} =1 v∗k − E((a − ak )+ ) k=1 and the step size sn satisfying sn → 0 , ∞ ∑ sn = ∞. n=1 In our numerical experiments we have used Christoph Helmberg’s implementation of the spectral bundle method from [59]. We also considered (and implemented) another alternative Lagrangean function, where at least some of the explicit nonanticipativity restrictions, namely the “most violated” ones, are treated with Lagrangean relaxation.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.38 of 5 – based on 36 votes