By John C. Lennox
If we're to think many smooth commentators, technology has squeezed God right into a nook, killed after which buried him with its all-embracing reasons. Atheism, we're instructed, is the one intellectually tenable place, and any try to reintroduce God is probably going to bog down the growth of technological know-how. during this stimulating and thought-provoking ebook, John Lennox invitations us to think about such claims very rigorously. Is it quite real, he asks, that every thing in technological know-how issues in the direction of atheism? may possibly it's attainable that theism sits extra with ease with technological know-how than atheism? Has technology buried God or now not? Now up to date and multiplied, God's Undertaker is a useful contribution to the talk approximately science's dating to faith
Read or Download God’s Undertaker: Has Science Buried God? PDF
Best theology books
Jonathan Edwards's Philosophy of Nature: The Re-Enchantment of the realm within the Age of medical Reasoning analyses the works of Jonathan Edwards (1703-1758) on normal philosophy in a sequence of contexts in which they might most sensible be explored and understood. Its objective is to put Edwards's writings on typical philosophy within the extensive old, theological and medical context of a wide selection of non secular responses to the increase of contemporary technology within the early smooth interval John Donne's response to the hot astronomical philosophy of Copernicus, Kepler and Galileo, in addition to to Francis Bacon's new normal philosophy; Blaise Pascal's reaction to Descartes' mechanical philosophy; the reactions to Newtonian technology and at last Jonathan Edwards's reaction to the medical tradition and mind's eye of his time.
"If we harbor innovations of violence or hatred, or search revenge or retribution, we're contributing to the wounding of the area; if we rework these concepts into forgiveness and compassion, after which flow past them to really make amends or restitution, we're contributing to the therapeutic of the area.
Will humans of different faiths be 'saved' and to what quantity may still the reaction to this question form Christian engagements with humans of different faiths? traditionally, the fundamental solution to those questions has been that the individual of one other religion are not kept and is consequently short of conversion to Christianity for his or her salvation to be attainable.
Gnostic the United States is a interpreting of present American tradition, politics, and spiritual lifestyles based on the traditional move often called Gnosticism. In it, Peter M Burfeind builds off the rules of Hans Jonas, Denis de Rougement, Norman Cohn, William Voegelin, Carl Jung, and Harold Bloom, every one of whom observed the results of Gnosticism in modern American (and Western) lifestyles.
- A Most Unlikely God: A Philosophical Enquiry into the Nature of God
- Heideggers Philosophy of Religion
- The Book of Enoch
- Getting on Message: Challenging the Christian Right from the Heart of the Gospel
- The Comforter
Extra resources for God’s Undertaker: Has Science Buried God?
In the Middle Ages, for instance, science had to free itself from certain aspects of Aristotelian philosophy before it could get up a real head of steam. Aristotle had taught that from the moon and beyond all was perfection and, since perfect motion, in his view, had to be circular, the planets and stars moved in perfect circles. Beneath the moon motion was linear and there was imperfection. This view dominated thought for centuries. Then Galileo looked through his telescope and saw the ragged edges of lunar craters.
Secondly, before we address the question whether intelligent design is crypto-creationism we need to avoid another potential misunderstanding by considering the meaning of the term ‘creationism’ itself. For its meaning has changed as well. ‘Creationism’ used to denote simply the belief that there was a Creator. However, it has now come to mean not only belief in a Creator but also a commitment to a whole additional raft of ideas by far the most dominant of which is a particular interpretation of Genesis which holds that the earth is only a few thousand years old.
So, is naturalism actually demanded by science? Or is it just conceivable that naturalism is a philosophy that is brought to science, more than something that is entailed by science? Could it even be, dare one ask, more like an expression of faith, akin to religious faith? One might at least be forgiven for thinking that from the way in which those who dare ask such questions are sometimes treated. Like religious heretics of a former age they may suffer a form of martyrdom by the cutting off of their grants.