By Robert Shaver
The location of rational egoism centres upon the concept that the rational factor to do has to be to pursue one's personal self-interest. concentrating on the paintings of Hobbes and Sidgwick, this ebook is an in depth background and evaluate of rational egoism. they're, after the ancients, the key exponents of rational egoism. He additionally considers different figures - Grotius, Samuel Clarke, John Clarke, Butler, Hume, Reid, Kant, Paley and Bentham - and a similar place: the instrumental thought of rationality. Robert Shaver's end is that not one of the arguments for rational egoism or the instrumental conception are cogent. this can be a tremendous ebook not only for historians of philosophy yet for all readers in philosophy or the social sciences drawn to theories of morality and rationality.
Read or Download Rational Egoism: A Selective and Critical History PDF
Similar history & surveys books
Greater than thirty eminent students from 9 diversified nations have contributed to The Cambridge background of Eighteenth-Century Philosophy - the main accomplished and up to date background of the topic to be had in English. For the eighteenth century the dominant thought in philosophy was once human nature and so it really is round this idea that the paintings is situated.
A accomplished historical past of global philosophy, this ebook can be a social background of world highbrow lifestyles. Eschewing polemics, it offers a worldly view of the a number of cultures of global historical past, disintegrates stereotypes of local cultures, and divulges how creativity is pushed through a variety of conflicting positions in each one neighborhood.
This e-book is the 1st targeted learn of Kant's approach to 'transcendental mirrored image' and its use within the Critique of natural cause to spot our simple human cognitive capacities, and to justify Kant's transcendental proofs of the required a priori stipulations for the opportunity of self-conscious human adventure.
This booklet argues that we will be able to simply advance a formal snatch of Kant’s functional philosophy if we relish the primary position performed in it via the proposal of the pursuits of cause. whereas it really is commonly said that Kant doesn't regard cause as a simply instrumental college, this e-book is the 1st to teach how his proposal of cause as guided via its personal pursuits bargains the main to a few of the main difficult facets of his functional philosophy.
- Skepticism and Naturalism: Some Varieties (Woodbridge Lectures)
- Main Philosophical Writings and the Novel Allwill (Mcgill-Queen's Studies in the History of Ideas)
- Routledge Philosophy GuideBook to Spinoza and the Ethics (Routledge Philosophy GuideBooks)
- Michel Foucault (Key Sociologists)
- Doing Philosophy
- Kierkegaard Within Your Grasp
Extra resources for Rational Egoism: A Selective and Critical History
65 Those who read Hobbes in this way see him as claiming that practical reason can only be instrumental reason. If one adds psychological egoism, one may seem to get rational egoism. And even if one does not add psychological egoism, the instrumental theory is still worth discussing, since this position will declare irrational duties that many moralists want to consider rational, particularly if predominant egoism is true. There is no doubt that Hobbes holds the instrumental theory. The calculation of consequences is the task of reason.
If one adds psychological egoism, one may seem to get rational egoism. And even if one does not add psychological egoism, the instrumental theory is still worth discussing, since this position will declare irrational duties that many moralists want to consider rational, particularly if predominant egoism is true. There is no doubt that Hobbes holds the instrumental theory. The calculation of consequences is the task of reason. 11, L 4/106-7, 5/110-11, 113, 115) When it comes to applying reason to action, Hobbes assumes that the relevant consequences concern the welfare of the agent deliberating.
2 seems to make the same claim: "It is a fond saying, that all laws are silent in the time of war, and it is a true one . . provided [the laws of nature] be referred not to the mind, but to the actions of men, by chap, iii art. 27 distinguishes between being prepared to follow the laws of nature and acting on them. One who kills on a basis other than fear shows that he is not prepared to follow the laws of nature. The law is not silent here. But the law is silent about the action of killing, without reference to any motive.